> Can you provide a link or a real technical reference for that claim > that shows the "bad GMSK"?
I have the proof here. Just connect an audio recorder to your discriminator output, and record your transmission. Then look at it in some software like Goldwave, and you'll see that the GMSK from the 91 drifts around the zero point making decoding more difficult. The GMSK from the 92 is rock steady around the centre point. It made the decoding more difficult to say the least. > I've only seen mailing list rumors about this, and no hard real > engineering testing linked to any of the messages. You can do it yourself. > Thanks, > > Nate WY0X Jonathan G4KLX
