My response on his list was moderated away, even though it was not antagonistic. I just didn't want a bunch of folks nagging the FCC about something non-regulatory. I also was mysteriously dropped from membership on the list, though he has auto approval set to rejoin. :)
Many of us are passionate about how things should be, and can disagree but D-STAR rolls forward and there is a lot of experimentation going on -- On May 22, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Nate Duehr wrote: > > Does that help make it clearer as to why there's really not a problem > until someone "experiments" all over all the other Gateway operators > toes? One of the developers out there is screaming and hollering that > people should "contact the FCC!" about Robin not allowing access to > ROBIN'S ADD-ON CODE. It really shows how stupid this person is... > Robin's code is Robin's code. Want to have a port of your own, write a > Gateway module and get some Gateway operators to install it. Tell them > why they should, etc. IT'S NOT THAT HARD. Why is this developer > frustrated? He's BROKE and doesn't have a Gateway to even work on, > unless he convinces someone to give him access to THEIRS. Now he says, > "Contact the FCC"? Since when is the FCC in charge of who gets access > to PROPRIETARY PRIVATE OWNED INTERNET SERVERS? > > > John Hays Amateur Radio: K7VE [email protected] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
