dulwich-users  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries David Borowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] Fix parameter order for Tree.add Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Tree entries David Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH] Added unit tests for dulwich.object_store.tree_lookup_path. Jeremy Whitlock
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH] Added unit tests for dulwich.object_store.tree_lookup_path. Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] My Dulwich roadmap David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] My Dulwich roadmap Jelmer Vernooij
• Re: [Dulwich-users] Building Dulwich on the mac fails with ver. 0.6.0 and 0.6.1 Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Building Dulwich on the mac fails with ver. 0.6.0 and 0.6.1 Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Building Dulwich on the mac fails with ver. 0.6.0 and 0.6.1 Matthew Daniel
• [Dulwich-users] windows development machine Matthew Daniel
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] windows development machine Matthew Daniel
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] windows development machine Jelmer Vernooij
• Re: [Dulwich-users] Is it possible to use hg-git from behind a proxy? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Is it possible to use hg-git from behind a proxy? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Is it possible to use hg-git from behind a proxy? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Is it possible to use hg-git from behind a proxy? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Is it possible to use hg-git from behind a proxy? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Is it possible to use hg-git from behind a proxy? Augie Fackler
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/4] Add eof() and unread_pkt_line() methods to Protocol. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others. David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] MissingObjectFinder: minor cleanup: 80 chars, others. David Borowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/4] server: Correct short-circuiting operation for no-op fetches. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/4] Add shallow clone support to the server. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] RFC/implemenmtation of shallow clone support. Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw Hans Kolek
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw Hans Kolek
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] make dulwich compile with mingw Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] 0.6.2 planning Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] 0.6.2 planning David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] 0.6.2 planning Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] 0.6.2 planning Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 00/10] Server and protocol cleanup dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/10] Allow overwriting id property of objects in test utils. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/10] Allow overwriting id property of objects in test utils. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/10] Allow overwriting id property of objects in test utils. David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/10] Allow overwriting id property of objects in test utils. David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/10] Allow overwriting id property of objects in test utils. Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 01/10] Allow overwriting id property of objects in test utils. David Borowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 02/10] Add utility functions to DictRefsContainer, useful for tests. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 03/10] test_server: Use real in-memory objects rather than ad-hoc stubs. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 04/10] Use run_git_or_fail in compat tests wherever possible. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 05/10] tests/compat/server_utils: Factor out several methods. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 06/10] server: Factor out _split_proto_line as a global. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 07/10] server: Explicitly specify allowed protocol commands. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 08/10] Delegate SHA peeling to the object store. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 09/10] protocol: Docstring cleanup. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 10/10] test_protocol: Standardize quote delimiters. dborowitz
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/7] side-band-64k in ReceivePackHandler dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/7] Factor out _report_status in ReceivePackHandler. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/7] Factor out a function to convert a line to a pkt-line. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/7] server: Change capabilities methods to classmethods. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/7] Tweak server handler injection. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 5/7] More flexible version checking for compat tests. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 6/7] Add side-band-64k support to ReceivePackHandler. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 7/7] Compat tests for servers with and without side-band-64k. dborowitz
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/8] Improved web tests. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/8] web: Distinguish between missing files and read errors. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/8] Fix iter_tree_contents iteration. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/8] Correct PSF copyright on web.date_time_string. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/8] test_web: Use MemoryRepo for tests instead of complex fakes. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 5/8] test_web: Simplify assertions about Content-Type. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 6/8] test/utils: Return non-__slot__ subclasses from make_object. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 7/8] Add more tests for web.py. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 8/8] test_web: Ensure cache headers are set correctly. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/8] Improved web tests. Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/9] Small features and bugfixes dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/9] test_objects: Remove unnecessary file writing. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/9] web: Handle empty-string CONTENT_LENGTH. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/9] web: Use write() callable for output. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/9] object_store: Make iter_tree_contents depth-first. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/9] object_store: Make iter_tree_contents depth-first. Jelmer Vernooij
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 5/9] object_store: Include subtrees in iteration. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 6/9] pack: Factor out write_pack_header. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 7/9] file: Don't error when creating GitFiles with the default mode. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 8/9] test_repository: Use GitFile when modifying packed-refs. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 9/9] pack: Add ThinPackData.from_file. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/9] Small features and bugfixes Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/9] Small features and bugfixes David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/9] Small features and bugfixes Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/9] Small features and bugfixes David Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Development branch updated again Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [ANNOUNCE] Dulwich 0.6.1 Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement Matthew Daniel
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement Matthew Daniel
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement Matthew Daniel
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] bin/dulwich improvement David Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Dulwich on Windows David Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Issues related to fetching Sean McDonald
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Issues related to fetching David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Issues related to fetching Sean McDonald
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Issues related to fetching David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Issues related to fetching Sean McDonald
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Issues related to fetching David Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Release planning Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Release planning Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? Seth Shelnutt
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? Seth Shelnutt
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? Seth Shelnutt
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich Pull/Push command? Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] d42-refactor-clients question Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] d42-refactor-clients question Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] d42-refactor-clients question Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] d42-refactor-clients question Jelmer Vernooij
• Re: [Dulwich-users] [Build #1807164] amd64 build of dulwich 0.6.0+bzr616~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (dulwich PPA) David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [Build #1807164] amd64 build of dulwich 0.6.0+bzr616~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (dulwich PPA) Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [Build #1807164] amd64 build of dulwich 0.6.0+bzr616~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (dulwich PPA) David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [Build #1807164] amd64 build of dulwich 0.6.0+bzr616~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (dulwich PPA) Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [Build #1807164] amd64 build of dulwich 0.6.0+bzr616~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (dulwich PPA) David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [Build #1807164] amd64 build of dulwich 0.6.0+bzr616~lucid1 in ubuntu lucid RELEASE (dulwich PPA) Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH v2 0/4] dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/4] Move reference WSGI handler to web.py. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] Use HTTPGitRequestHandler for test_web. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/4] Move dul-daemon's main functionality to server. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/4] Move dul-web's main functionality to web. dborowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] [PATCH v2 0/4] Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Dulwich 0.6.1 plans Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich 0.6.1 plans Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich 0.6.1 plans David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Dulwich 0.6.1 plans Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 0/4] Move entry points out of stub scripts dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/4] Move reference WSGI handler to web.py. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/4] Use HTTPGitRequestHandler for test_web. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/4] Move dul-web's main functionality to web. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/4] Move dul-daemon's main functionality to server. dborowitz
• [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 1/5] Move named file initilization to BaseRepo. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 3/5] Add a MemoryRepo that stores everything in memory. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 4/5] Add logging utilities and server logging. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 5/5] Add simple logging to HTTP server. dborowitz
  • [Dulwich-users] [PATCH 2/5] Use correct path separators for named repo files. dborowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Merging dul-web and dul-daemon ? David Borowitz
• [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging David Borowitz
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Patches: sorted_tree_items, header cleanup, MemoryRepo, logging Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] [ANNOUNCE] dulwich 0.6.0 Jelmer Vernooij
• Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Other changes? Jelmer Vernooij
• [Dulwich-users] Bitbucket mirror anatoly techtonik
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Bitbucket mirror Jelmer Vernooij
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Bitbucket mirror Augie Fackler
  • Re: [Dulwich-users] Bitbucket mirror Jelmer Vernooij

• Earlier messages
• Later messages