> Anyway, if we want to give people the option of bypassing the Inbox > for ESN notifications, then it will require a fair amount of work on > ESN itself. I know that for LJ, the reasoning was that emails > sometimes don't make it (are delayed, get lost somewhere, etc.), so > the Inbox was a requirement so people wouldn't lose anything. If we > want to get rid of that requirement for Dreamwidth, we can (with > development time, of course). Or maybe we should talk about other > methods of solving the issue, such as a more robust and organized > Inbox that doesn't get cluttered/slow when there's a lot of stuff in > it.
Well, I'm okay with them hitting the inbox, but perhaps we can make it default to 'read' for items that are also being emailed. I.e., if we know you're sending it to both inbox + email, then we put it in the inbox as already read. We can also automatically archive, maybe? Or make the inbox view show only unread items? -- Mark Smith / xb95 [email protected] _______________________________________________ dw-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.dwscoalition.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dw-discuss
