On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:54:25PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:53:45PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 04:26:22PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote: > > > On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > > >> Making a release? > > > > > > > >No, let's wait some days... This change needs a mental settle first ;) > > > > > > Hm, this is better than the full rectangle, yet I find it visually > > > unpleasing; I'd like to see the following (I'd already have tried it > > > if I were at a unix box, but I am not): > > > - dot in the bottom right. > > > - line on top 3/4 width, line on the left side 1/2 height, both 1 px > > > from the side, joining at the topleft corner. > > > > > > This would be pretty much like some of the stuff we've seen today, but > > > less 3d and maybe nicer to see than the current situation (basically I > > > just don't like the line being "angleless"). > > > > Yeah, I also don't feel so well with the hg tip atm. I got a > > different idea, which basically would work as follows: > > > > - no dot at all > > - tags of focused client are indicated through border and bottom > s/border/top/
Hi Anselm, This does not work for me. It's not clear to which the tags the vertical lines belong and I find I have to look at the status bar longer to figure out what's going on. The original set-up with the dots was quite satisfactory as far as I'm concerned. A combination of dots for occupied tags and a rectangle for the tags of the focussed client is also okay but more obtrusive than just the dots. cheers, Anthony
