On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:59:35AM -0600, Seth Graham wrote:
> > Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > >On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> > >>> Making a release?
> > >>
> > >>No, let's wait some days... This change needs a mental settle first ;)
> > >
> > >Hm, this is better than the full rectangle, yet I find it visually
> > >unpleasing;
> >
> > I think the line is a better idea than the dots though.. two dots was
> > extremely confusing. I think if I were implementing this sort of change,
> > I'd manipulate the font weight before adding dots and lines. Maybe
> > something like bold = current client, italics = empty tag.
>
> I think that might be the way to go...
Just checked, italic is not possible, bold won't be a problem...
We can do without italics. The problem with vertical lines is as
Anthony said: are they to the left of the tag name? The right? Both?
What about bolded tag names for populated tags and [brackets] around
focused-client-tag names? It would mean rendering whitespace around
each tag name initially, though, in order to keep the tag list from
resizing every time focus changes.
Kurt
