On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 07:30:24PM -0600, Kurt Maier wrote: > On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:06:47PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 09:59:35AM -0600, Seth Graham wrote: > >> > Sander van Dijk wrote: > >> > >On 12/1/06, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 03:29:11PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > >> > >>> Making a release? > >> > >> > >> > >>No, let's wait some days... This change needs a mental settle first > >;) > >> > > > >> > >Hm, this is better than the full rectangle, yet I find it visually > >> > >unpleasing; > >> > > >> > I think the line is a better idea than the dots though.. two dots was > >> > extremely confusing. I think if I were implementing this sort of > >change, > >> > I'd manipulate the font weight before adding dots and lines. Maybe > >> > something like bold = current client, italics = empty tag. > >> > >> I think that might be the way to go... > > > >Just checked, italic is not possible, bold won't be a problem... > > > > We can do without italics. The problem with vertical lines is as > Anthony said: are they to the left of the tag name? The right? Both? > > What about bolded tag names for populated tags and [brackets] around > focused-client-tag names? It would mean rendering whitespace around > each tag name initially, though, in order to keep the tag list from > resizing every time focus changes.
Well, note my winner proposal, that's the way to go in my eyes. It's quite intuitiv after some hours of work during night. -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
