On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:16:15PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > > Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2006-12-01, 17:06): > > > > > > I think the line is a better idea than the dots though.. two dots was > > > > extremely confusing. I think if I were implementing this sort of > > > > change, > > > > I'd manipulate the font weight before adding dots and lines. Maybe > > > > something like bold = current client, italics = empty tag. > > > > > > I think that might be the way to go... > > > > This will look terribly ugly on bitmap fonts with fake-italics (and > > often fake-bold too. > > > > How about trying a different background color instead of the second dot > > than (or any other graphic symbols)? Just one more color configurable > > from config.h. What do you think? > > Nah, we already have enough colors. Let's check Sanders > proposal.
hg tip contains sander1.png: http://www.suckless.org/shots/sander1.png http://www.suckless.org/shots/sander2.png Dunno, It's definately better, but still not so great ;) -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
