Christoph Lohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good evening.
Hi, > Am Mon, 05 May 2008 20:35:38 +0200 > schrieb Matthias-Christian Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example). > > Things we need for establishing such a democratic system: > > 1.) A voting register for classifying the voting population > 2.) A classification of topics for that population > 3.) A list of political incorrect words for that population > 4.) A common level of language experience the population > understands > > After that we can start analyzing the population and use the gath- > ered data to create a neutral poll at a date where we can assure > that the democratic will of that population is expressed. I don't > know if there are examples in the history of Free Software that > forced voting has worked. > > The first task to start the system incubation is to vote for > a committee that works on the constitution of dwm, which needs > to be accepted by the registered population. > > Will you accept the position of the head of that committee? Come on it's enough now. Do you remember how this pointless discussion started: | Polls are stupid. I just wanted to involve the users a bit on this issue. And in fact this statement is stupid and not polls. | Let's do a poll! So what's so offensive about this statement that it causes such a noise? Why don't we just shut up, concentrate on the problem and perhaps propose a solution, because I think the criticism on dwm's behaviour is valid. I just wanted to involve everyone to comment on the multihead behaviour if he likes to. So we can have a system that working better than now, because it seemed there are problems. And that's that! > Sincerely, > > Christoph Lohmann Regards Matthias-Christian
