> Come on it's enough now. Do you remember how this pointless discussion > started: > > | Polls are stupid. > > I just wanted to involve the users a bit on this issue. And in fact this > statement is stupid and not polls.
> Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain "framework" > of course - you can't come along and expect someone to integrate cairo > or so). And this is why we have to make clear what exactly sucks less. > So what's so offensive about this statement that it causes such a noise? > Why don't we just shut up, concentrate on the problem and perhaps > propose a solution, because I think the criticism on dwm's behaviour is > valid. Because you can't come along and expect polls on the dwm mailing list. Like I said, there is a clear and strict framework*g*
