----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:53
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
>What about intentional qrmers?
These guys have now found another way to make it difficult for DX'ers in
a "split" pile-up. They quickly find the station that's been answered by the
DX-station and send a carrier over the caller instead - this also
prevents the QSO to "be finished".
Whatever we do, these intentional QRM'ers will be ahead of us!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 4:39
PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
Many times through the years when a DX
station has asked for "up" several times and is ignored they have
immediately gone QRT.....look forward to this in the future
also.
73 Norm
K1AA
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:01
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
What about intentional
qrmers? Nothing short of direction finding and enforcement by Governments
will have any effect on that, and that simply will not happen. What choice
does the Dx have but to continue on the best he can, and work those
fortunate enough to hear him through the bedlam? I have even monitored
stations intentionally interfering with high seas rescue operations where
lives hung in the balance. If people with transmitting equipment are sick
enough to do that, how can we expect any less regarding Dx operations?
There are many possible motives involved in qrming a particular Dx
operation, and expecting the ones doing such things to somehow develop
self control and concern for one's fellow man is not realistic. Can we
somehow come up with new ways to circumvent the problem of qrm on the DX
transmit frequency? Maybe, but I don't think answering callers on their
own frequency is the way. I think this has been done before, resulting in
massive chaos.
73 for now,
Duane, WV2B
______________SNIP by
SM5DQC______________
