At 11:05 03/19/06, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
6. The net or alleged net or sked or alleged sked that "always"
operates on
or around this frequency and time, thus giving them hypothetical ownership
of the frequency range, who either demand that the DX move, the pile-up
move, or who blunder on with their QSO anyway
7. The usually innocent QSO that suddenly gets QRM from the DX
and/or pileup
due to propagation shift, who rather than move (if they can) try to blunder
on, either not knowing or not caring that they're now QRM'ing the DX &
pileup back
Well, going outside the US phone bands would certainly take care of
these, from the North American end of things at least.
As for frequency cops, no, you'll never get rid of those cretins. For
those who forget or have problems comprehending the term "split" and
who tx out of band (I don't hear it too terribly on 40 SSB, just a
couple here and there), well, just get Riley to stand by with a tape
recorder and a pad of violation notices. Hey! What an idea! Have the
FCC sponsor DXpeditions to Navassa and Desecheo, listen for the US
lids to transmit out of band, fine' 'em all and have the national
debt retired in two weekends flat!
- Peter
W2IRT
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, [email protected]
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
