Wasn't that the call used in P5/OH2AM ??
GERRY wrote:
It's clear that OH2AM is a club call and therefore Class C.
call name address zip city class @sral.fi email
OH0B OH0R OH2R OH0AM OH2AM OH-DX-Ring Ry PL 73 02381 ESPOO
C
http://oh-callbook.sral.fi/?call=oh2am&name=&addr=&zip=&city=&class=&lang=EN
<http://oh-callbook.sral.fi/?call=oh2am&name=&addr=&zip=&city=&class=&lang=EN>
It's clear that the CEPT regulations does not include class C in their
OH allowed CEPT users.
Appendix 2: http://www.ero.dk/doc98/Official/Word/TR6101E.DOC
Gerry VE6LB
----- Original Message -----
*From:* Zack Widup <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* dx-chat@njdxa.org <mailto:dx-chat@njdxa.org>
*Sent:* Friday, December 28, 2007 5:00 PM
*Subject:* RE: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> A very interesting document.
>
> I noticed that one item appeared to be missing... when the first
complaints
> surfaced, one of the "charges" was that of possibly illegal
entry to FJ via
> a privately chartered boat, as I recall. No mention of that in
the letter.
> As a certain fictional television character used to say,
"Fascinating."
>
> The charge over the alleged misuse of the club callsign for the
DXpedition
> is probably the most serious complaint. But as meticulous as
Martti usually
> is on planning his jaunts, I find it hard to believe that this
detail was
> overlooked. And, of course, nobody's perfect, so it may have
been a true
> oversight on his part.
>
I wondered about that myself. As you said, "Fascinating!"
> But... was a license issued, and if so, what call was on it? If
FJ/OH2AM
> was on the license -- does that make the operation invalid? I'm
sure that's
> one of the things the DXAC and DXCC desk will get to iron out, a
task I
> don't envy them.
>
I was under the impression that as a CEPT country, anyone from
another
CEPT country could just go there and operate. I could just go and
operate
as FJ/W9SZ. The main contention seems to be now about the
callsign used
after the "FJ/".
> Having said that... I've got to tell you, gang, that this is one
of a string
> of disturbing precedents that we've seen over the last few
years. Sort of a
> DX'ing version of NIMBY. Recall all the complaints from the HP
hams over
> the H8A trip a few years back, for one (specifically over the
actual call on
> the license)? And there have been others along the same lines,
which many
> of you know much more about than I ever will.
>
> I can't blame some of the resident FJ hams from feeling that
their triumph
> got trumped, that their own plans to "inaugurate" the new entity
in their
> own way got pulled out from under them. Under similar
circumstances, I
> might feel the same way. But whatever happened (I ask
rhetorically) to good
> sportsmanship?
>
> 73, ron w3wn
>
So where are they? Why aren't they doing a similar operation when
they
know how much in demand the entity still is?
73, Zack W9SZ
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
<mailto:dx-chat@njdxa.org>
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
--
Ronald Loneker Sr.- KA2BZS
#1DXCC Honor Roll - 9BDXCC
A-1 Op - QCWA
http://www.cwforever.com
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA
http://njdxa.org
