> Yes. The CEPT license will allow any OH with a license class 
> L, P, T, Y to operate in any CEPT country including FJ.

Of course BOTH OPERATORS hold class Y licenses.  It also appears 
that one of the operators may, in fact be trustee of the club 
callsign used.  What's the beef other than a case of sour grapes 
from a few Frenchmen who were too late to the party and missed le 
nouvelle Beaujolais? 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of GERRY
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 9:17 PM
> To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms
> 
> 
> 
> Bill,
> 
> Yes. The CEPT license will allow any OH with a license class 
> L, P, T, Y to operate in any CEPT country including FJ. There 
> is no mention of the C class OH license. 
> 
> It's certainly one for the DXCC Desk to sort out.
> 
> Gerry VE6LB
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Bill 
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; dx-chat@njdxa.org 
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms
> 
> 
> Wouldn't it be what type of license FJ allowed, not OH ???
> Bill
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: GERRY 
> To: dx-chat@njdxa.org 
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 8:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms
> 
> 
> 
> It's clear that OH2AM is a club call and therefore Class C.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] email
> OH0B OH0R OH2R OH0AM OH2AMOH-DX-Ring RyPL 7302381ESPOO  C
> 
> http://oh-callbook.sral.fi/?call=oh2am&name=&addr=&zip=&city=&;
> class=&lang=EN
> 
> It's clear that the CEPT regulations does not include class C 
> in their OH allowed CEPT users.
> Appendix 2: http://www.ero.dk/doc98/Official/Word/TR6101E.DOC
> 
> Gerry VE6LB
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Zack Widup 
> To: dx-chat@njdxa.org 
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 5:00 PM
> Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms
> 
> 
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote:
> 
> > A very interesting document.
> >
> > I noticed that one item appeared to be missing... when the 
> first complaints
> > surfaced, one of the "charges" was that of possibly illegal 
> entry to FJ via
> > a privately chartered boat, as I recall.  No mention of 
> that in the letter.
> > As a certain fictional television character used to say, 
> "Fascinating."
> >
> > The charge over the alleged misuse of the club callsign for 
> the DXpedition
> > is probably the most serious complaint.  But as meticulous 
> as Martti usually
> > is on planning his jaunts, I find it hard to believe that 
> this detail was
> > overlooked.  And, of course, nobody's perfect, so it may 
> have been a true
> > oversight on his part.
> >
> 
> I wondered about that myself.  As you said, "Fascinating!"
> 
> > But... was a license issued, and if so, what call was on 
> it?  If FJ/OH2AM
> > was on the license -- does that make the operation invalid? 
>  I'm sure that's
> > one of the things the DXAC and DXCC desk will get to iron 
> out, a task I
> > don't envy them.
> >
> 
> I was under the impression that as a CEPT country, anyone 
> from another 
> CEPT country could just go there and operate.  I could just 
> go and operate 
> as FJ/W9SZ.  The main contention seems to be now about the 
> callsign used 
> after the "FJ/".
> 
> > Having said that... I've got to tell you, gang, that this 
> is one of a string
> > of disturbing precedents that we've seen over the last few 
> years.  Sort of a
> > DX'ing version of NIMBY.  Recall all the complaints from 
> the HP hams over
> > the H8A trip a few years back, for one (specifically over 
> the actual call on
> > the license)?  And there have been others along the same 
> lines, which many
> > of you know much more about than I ever will.
> >
> > I can't blame some of the resident FJ hams from feeling 
> that their triumph
> > got trumped, that their own plans to "inaugurate" the new 
> entity in their
> > own way got pulled out from under them.  Under similar 
> circumstances, I
> > might feel the same way.  But whatever happened (I ask 
> rhetorically) to good
> > sportsmanship?
> >
> > 73, ron w3wn
> >
> 
> So where are they?  Why aren't they doing a similar operation 
> when they 
> know how much in demand the entity still is?
> 
> 73, Zack W9SZ
> 
> 
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
> 
> To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
> 
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
> http://njdxa.org
> 
> 
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
> 
> To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
> 
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
> http://njdxa.org 
> 
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
> 
> To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
> 
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
> http://njdxa.org 
> 
> Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
> http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
> 
> To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org
> 
> This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
> http://njdxa.org 
> 



Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems 
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat

To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA 
http://njdxa.org

Reply via email to