> I'm not sure if we should/could do this with the next release. Then, > it would not really be DynAPI 2, but really DynAPI 2 and 3/4. That > would mean a lot of restructuring. No problem for me, but for others > it may be. Plus all of the documentation would need to be changed as > well. If enough people want to get involved and help out that would > be fine, but if not then it would be difficult to update all of the > info. You can count me in to do a bit of documentation. Not all, but some. --- Daniel H _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dynapi-dev
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Raymond Smith
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Richard Bennett
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Scott Andrew LePera
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Raymond Smith
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Doug Melvin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Robert Rainwater
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Doug Melvin
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Pascal Bestebroer
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Doug Melvin
- [Dynapi-Dev] developers woe's [was Re:... Henrik Våglin
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Daniel Holmen
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Jordi - IlMaestro - Ministral
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Cameron Hart
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Raymond Smith
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Cameron Hart
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Pascal Bestebroer
- Re: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Raymond Smith
- RE: [Dynapi-Dev] structure change ideas Pascal Bestebroer