Don't wet your pants. I missed that detail ;) What am I supposed to get over? I have no intention to fuck guy, don't even know him...
and... exhale...... So why are your employers looking at the DynAPI distro at all? They should only be looking at a branch that is under your/their control. Or a branch that can be GUARANTEED TO WORK. That's the only thing that matters. cherio PS. STOP REPLYING TO ALL... pretty annoying to get duplicate mails > And yet AGAIN.. > WE ARE STILL USING THE ORIGIONAL DISTRO. > THIS IS NOT THE PROBLEM. > THE PROBLEM IS WITH POTENTIAL USERS AND EMPLOYERS LOOKING AT THE 'STABLE > RELEASE' > AND FINDING THAT IT IS NOT STABLE!!!!!!!! > > FUCK GUY. GET OVER IT. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bart Bizon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 5:29 PM > Subject: Fwd: [Dynapi-Dev] Doug, READ LICENSE.TXT, PLEASE!!! > > > > > > > > Granted. > > > > But here's another question. > > Why did you not develop your own branch independently of DynAPI. > > If you are coding a largescale commercial site, you should have absolute > control over the code. > > With an opensource distro, you don't. > > > > I did exactly this with dynAPI1 ways back, as stuff was not working etc. > > > > > > > >So now the only interesting question remaining, as I see it, is: > > > >Who is more stupid? The developer committing an unstable release, or > the > > > developer committing _to_ an unstable >release (even if neither one > knows > > > it's unstable). > > > > > > How about the person who packedges it and send's it off as a 'stable > > > release' ? > > > > > > Nevermind. > > > > > > For the very lst time. > > > I am sorry. I was upset and said things I sould have not. > > > > > > We (as a group) made a decision to follow a standard and have faild to > do so > > > (as seems the norm these days for this group). > > > > > > Management knows fully well that this is an opensource project developed > by > > > people who are volunteering their time. > > > I just don't think it's too much to check out the examples before > calling > > > something a 'stable release'. > > > > > > Not only that, I am still waiting for the next 'stable release' so That > I > > > can show them some sort of forward motion. > > > > > > This project is intended to make a coder's life easier. > > > Most of the people who have gotten invloved in this project did so for > their > > > own good: to be able to produce quick, cross-browser solutions. > > > I would think that the people using this product in the real world would > > > have some interest in have the DynAPI somewhat resemble a real tool. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
