Because they are management, and are thuslly computer illiterate.. to them one distro is the same as the next..
This is the type that is using NS 4.08 "because it works" no matter how often their admin's tell them to upgrade. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bart Bizon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 5:55 PM Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Doug, READ LICENSE.TXT, PLEASE!!! > Don't wet your pants. > I missed that detail ;) > > What am I supposed to get over? > I have no intention to fuck guy, don't even know him... > > and... exhale...... > > So why are your employers looking at the DynAPI distro at all? > They should only be looking at a branch that is under your/their control. > Or a branch that can be GUARANTEED TO WORK. > That's the only thing that matters. > > cherio > > PS. STOP REPLYING TO ALL... > pretty annoying to get duplicate mails > > > > And yet AGAIN.. > > WE ARE STILL USING THE ORIGIONAL DISTRO. > > THIS IS NOT THE PROBLEM. > > THE PROBLEM IS WITH POTENTIAL USERS AND EMPLOYERS LOOKING AT THE 'STABLE > > RELEASE' > > AND FINDING THAT IT IS NOT STABLE!!!!!!!! > > > > FUCK GUY. GET OVER IT. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bart Bizon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 5:29 PM > > Subject: Fwd: [Dynapi-Dev] Doug, READ LICENSE.TXT, PLEASE!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > > Granted. > > > > > > But here's another question. > > > Why did you not develop your own branch independently of DynAPI. > > > If you are coding a largescale commercial site, you should have absolute > > control over the code. > > > With an opensource distro, you don't. > > > > > > I did exactly this with dynAPI1 ways back, as stuff was not working etc. > > > > > > > > > > >So now the only interesting question remaining, as I see it, is: > > > > >Who is more stupid? The developer committing an unstable release, or > > the > > > > developer committing _to_ an unstable >release (even if neither one > > knows > > > > it's unstable). > > > > > > > > How about the person who packedges it and send's it off as a 'stable > > > > release' ? > > > > > > > > Nevermind. > > > > > > > > For the very lst time. > > > > I am sorry. I was upset and said things I sould have not. > > > > > > > > We (as a group) made a decision to follow a standard and have faild to > > do so > > > > (as seems the norm these days for this group). > > > > > > > > Management knows fully well that this is an opensource project developed > > by > > > > people who are volunteering their time. > > > > I just don't think it's too much to check out the examples before > > calling > > > > something a 'stable release'. > > > > > > > > Not only that, I am still waiting for the next 'stable release' so That > > I > > > > can show them some sort of forward motion. > > > > > > > > This project is intended to make a coder's life easier. > > > > Most of the people who have gotten invloved in this project did so for > > their > > > > own good: to be able to produce quick, cross-browser solutions. > > > > I would think that the people using this product in the real world would > > > > have some interest in have the DynAPI somewhat resemble a real tool. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > Dynapi-Dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/ > _______________________________________________ Dynapi-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mail-archive.com/dynapi-dev@lists.sourceforge.net/
