+1 >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:eap-features- >[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edoardo Comar >Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:55 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [Eap-features] Code Analysis : step 2 (was RE: Automatically >create compiler output path) > >I strongly agree with Hani. > >> My love for IDEA stems from the fact that it's an editor. >> That is what I use it for, to edit my java code. Once IDEA > >Edo > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hani Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: 31 October 2001 18:48 >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [Eap-features] Code Analysis : step 2 (was RE: >> Automatically create compiler output path) >> >> >> -1 to audits, UML, more netbeans-like behaviour, and all >> other such things. >> >> My love for IDEA stems from the fact that it's an editor. >> That is what I use it for, to edit my java code. Once IDEA >> has an openAPI, then I'm all for people writing whatever >> plugins they want to do auditing, i18n, >> stupidvariablenamedetection, UML, and whatever else people >> feel is important. However, It'll all be optional, and I can >> stilll have my 5mb IDEA download. After that I get to choose >> how lean or not I want to run it! >> >> >> On 31/10/01 12:37 pm, "Noah Nordrum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Apparently not every likes audits :) >> > >> > I personally like the audits that are part of Together. It >> would also >> be >> > nice if they would expose an interface (don't forget about >> supporting >> > auto-fix) for custom audits, and then perhaps make an audit >> repository >> that >> > people could submit their audits to. This way, they could >> get support >> for >> > audits into IDEA very quickly, and allow us to work on building a >> useful >> > suite of audits. >> > >> > Let me remind all you audit haters in advance, YOU DO NOT >> HAVE TO USE >> EVERY >> > FEATURE IN IDEA. Audits would be a nice compliment to the JUnit >> integration, >> > and would help with creating more consistent code (which is what I'm >> sure we >> > all are trying our best to avoid ;> ). >> > >> > Noah >> > >> > p.s. (I just thought of this) is there a way to modify the >> "template" >> that >> > is used for when you do "create getters/setters"? that >> would be a nice >> way >> > to satisfy all of the ways that people want their getters/setters >> created >> > since I remember that subject caused some serious >> controversy a month >> or two >> > ago... >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Alain RAVET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 6:26 AM >> > Subject: [Eap-features] Code Analysis : step 2 (was RE: >> Automatically >> create >> > compiler output path) >> > >> > >> >> For >> >>> AR> 4� Stupid looking names >> >>> AR> no vowels : String ptrkpppzz = ... >> >>> AR> too short : int pe = ... >> >>> AR> too long with same case >> >>> AR> : boolean >> thisiscryingforabettercasing = false >> ; >> >>> AR> ... >> >> >> >> Bluntpeak wrote >> >>>> -1 >> >> >> >> Dmitry Jemerov wrote >> >>>> -10 >> >> >> >> >> >> Whooooo. Cool down guys. >> >> This was not the point of my origigal post. >> >> >> >> It was just food for thought, >> >> to trigger an answer to the real question >> >> "Do we want code analysis in IDEA" >> >> and it worked. >> >> >> >> If we all agree on this point (and I only got positive answers to >> this), >> >> then we can start thinking about what we want to put in our bag. >> >> >> >> Now, we can start thinking about what, and in what order. >> You already >> >> saw my first sketch. >> >> >> >> Who wants what, and in what priority >> >> >> >> I think >> >> - metrics based code smells >> >> (class/method too big/small) >> >> should come first (like next week :0) >> >> >> >> - dead code tracker should come second >> >> should come second. >> >> I'd kill a virtuagirl for this one. >> >> >> >> >> >> Alain Ravet >> >> >> >> >> >> This mail has been checked by exiscan. >> >> To be safe, please scan the mail attachements with your local virus >> > scanner ! >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Eap-features mailing list >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features >> > >> > >> > _________________________________________________________ >> > Do You Yahoo!? >> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Eap-features mailing list >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Eap-features mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-> features >> > > >_______________________________________________ >Eap-features mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
_______________________________________________ Eap-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-features
