an effective code folding feature would probably be defined differently for different people, and perhaps deemed useful differently for different tasks. >From the few renditions we see in this list, this is getting to be pretty apparent. I hope the IntelliJ team is taking this one seriously enough to give us, the users, options to twig the actual cold folding mechanism. For example,
1) fold code to show only method signatures 2) fold code to show only the method signature and the javadoc 3) fold code to show only the method signature and the first line of javadoc 4) fold code completely, replacing with user-defining "marking" comments. 5) fold code by accessibility, get/set methods, overwritten, etc. 6) fold code by methods whose names matched some user-defined regular expression. Just a thought. Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Deblauwe, Wim Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:01 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Code Folding, yeehaw!!! WasRE: [Eap-list] Ariadna feature list yeah, but wouldn't it be usefull to fold the methods and not the javadoc, to write the javadoc? -----Original Message----- From: Shane Petroff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: woensdag 16 januari 2002 2:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Code Folding, yeehaw!!! WasRE: [Eap-list] Ariadna feature list Michael Kirby wrote: > /** First sentence of javadoc */ > public void doit(int stuff) Sounds good to me. +1 -- Shane _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
