Chris Merrill wrote: > Deblauwe, Wim wrote: > > > yeah, but wouldn't it be usefull to fold the methods and not the > javadoc, to > > write the javadoc? > > Not for me...if I'm writing JavaDoc...I'd want > to see the method.
Me too. But, hiding the method forces you to write what the method does, not HOW it does it - that could be a good thing. I don't expect the folding to be restricted to complete-file operations... I mean, you could have one javadoc open, the next folded, an if statement folded, a method open, the next one closed etc. Take a look at vim's folding to see those sort of possibilities in action. ash _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
