+ fold the whole class to see the class doc, the imports and the package statement ;-)
Sorry, can't resist. Tom At 00:23 16.01.02 -0800, you wrote: >an effective code folding feature would probably be defined differently for >different people, and perhaps deemed useful differently for different tasks. > From the few renditions we see in this list, this is getting to be pretty >apparent. I hope the IntelliJ team is taking this one seriously enough to >give us, the users, options to twig the actual cold folding mechanism. For >example, > >1) fold code to show only method signatures >2) fold code to show only the method signature and the javadoc >3) fold code to show only the method signature and the first line of javadoc >4) fold code completely, replacing with user-defining "marking" comments. >5) fold code by accessibility, get/set methods, overwritten, etc. >6) fold code by methods whose names matched some user-defined regular >expression. > >Just a thought. > > >Mike > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Deblauwe, Wim >Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:01 AM >To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: RE: Code Folding, yeehaw!!! WasRE: [Eap-list] Ariadna feature list > >yeah, but wouldn't it be usefull to fold the methods and not the javadoc, to >write the javadoc? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Shane Petroff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: woensdag 16 januari 2002 2:01 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Code Folding, yeehaw!!! WasRE: [Eap-list] Ariadna feature >list > > >Michael Kirby wrote: > > > /** First sentence of javadoc */ > > public void doit(int stuff) > >Sounds good to me. +1 > >-- >Shane _______________________________________________ Eap-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellij.com/mailman/listinfo/eap-list
