Scientists do "story selection" all the time, though they may be reluctant to admit it. They (we) select the hypotheses to be tested, then select the subjects, data to be collected, field and analytical methods, presentation methods, etc. It's not much different than what documentary filmmakers or journalists do. All are choices driven by the need to make the best use of the medium you are communicating in.

Scientists shouldn't be so blind to the "subjectivity" that goes into their work. Such blindness, as we have seen in the scientific controversy over the past few years, has helped feed the erosion of credibility that many institutions in our society have felt.

Dave

On 9/26/2010 10:43 AM, William Silvert wrote:
This is a very distorted response to CL's posting. The fact that Nick had a story to tell does not mean that it was only for entertainment. If I were making nature films the story I would want to tell is what I as an ecologist think is going on in nature rather than what is easy to photograph. For example, CL writes "Nick even managed to film behavior that was suspected but not yet observed." which I suspect meant filming actions that were scientifically significant but not very evident.

An example of what I have in mind is films of whale corpses in deep water being degraded by hagfish and other detritivores. The process of recycling dead animals is very important, but ugly and often hard to film. Coming upon a dead whale on the seabed would be a rare event indeed, and I assume that to make these films they find a dead whale that has washed up on shore and tow it out to sea for the filming. Purists might cmplain that this is fakery, but I would call it deciding what story deserves to be told and manipulating nature to tell it. Entertaining? Not necessarily.

Bill Silvert

----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren W. Aney" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: domingo, 26 de Setembro de 2010 6:46
Subject: Re: [ECOLOG-L] Naturefaking in media


This is a good, explanatory message. However, the most telling line in this message is "Nick... [was]always filming in a way most likely to get the shot for the story he was trying to tell." This describes the difference between
entertainment (the story the person filming wants to tell) vs. science
(recording the story the subject is telling).

Warren W. Aney
Senior Wildife Ecologist
Tigard, Oregon


--
------------------------------------------------------
 David M. Lawrence        | Home:  (804) 559-9786
 7471 Brook Way Court     | Fax:   (804) 559-9787
 Mechanicsville, VA 23111 | Email: [email protected]
 USA                      | http:  http://fuzzo.com
------------------------------------------------------

"All drains lead to the ocean."  -- Gill, Finding Nemo

"We have met the enemy and he is us."  -- Pogo

"No trespassing
 4/17 of a haiku"  --  Richard Brautigan

Reply via email to