On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Mark Salter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:07 +0200, Atilay Yilmaz wrote: >> > >> I compiled it again to print 'val', Gary: >> smsc_lan91cxx_init: No 91Cxx signature found e59f > > The e59f looks suspiciously like the upper 16 bits of an arm opcode. > Maybe check that the base address being used is correct. > > --Mark > thanks, I will check it. somehow, the signature is 0xe5 instead of 0x33
-- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
