On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:07 +0200, Atilay Yilmaz wrote:
> >
> I compiled it again to print 'val', Gary:
> smsc_lan91cxx_init: No 91Cxx signature found e59f

The e59f looks suspiciously like the upper 16 bits of an arm opcode.
Maybe check that the base address being used is correct.

--Mark



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

Reply via email to