Only if the invoice arrives before the ASN :-)
Brian Test
E-Commerce Analyst
ACCO North America
300 Tower Parkway
Lincolnshire, IL 60069-3640
(800) 222-6462 x3973
(847) 419-4140 FAX
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Alan Kotok [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent:   Friday, September 08, 2000 9:25 AM
        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject:        Re: Stupid EDI Stories

        William, et al.

        Do stupid EDI stories include Advance Ship Notices that arrive after
the
        shipment?

        Alan Kotok
        Director, Education and Information Resources
        Data Interchange Standards Association
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        +1 703-518-4174
        ** DISA's E-Business and Internet Conference, 7-9 March 2001, in San
Francisco.
        http://www.disa.org/conference/annual_conf/index.htm **




        At 04:54 PM 9/7/00 -0400, William J. Kammerer wrote:
        >I am collecting Stupid EDI Stories for my magnum opus on electronic
        >commerce.  Or if I never get around to writing it, then at least I
can
        >spread the stories around the office for a few laughs. As an
example,
        >here is a contribution from an EDISIM fan at a trucking company:
        >
        >    The human element still rules.  One of our major customers, who
        >    shall remain nameless, is a heavy user of EDI.  We receive Load
        >    Tenders (204s) from them and are supposed to accept or reject
        >    hauling the load via a 990.  The idea is that they can track
        >    accepted and rejected loads as one measure of performance.  But
        >    to avoid an unfavorable rating, their customer service reps
        >    instruct our people to never reject any loads via EDI.
Instead,
        >    we call them and the rep withdraws the tenders for any loads we
        >    don't want.  Thus we (and our rep there) always come out
perfect
        >    on the loads accepted report.
        >
        >I'm sure it wouldn't be hard to find many similar examples of
people
        >circumventing the intentions of EDI.  Would you mind sharing your
        >favorite stories of egregious EDI practices?  Though I would
appreciate
        >knowing the companies involved, you can rest assured that I will
keep
        >their real identities secret.
        >
        >Does anyone really think that XML will solve these sort of
problems?
        >
        >William J. Kammerer
        >FORESIGHT Corp.
        >4950 Blazer Memorial Pkwy.
        >Dublin, OH USA 43017-3305
        >+1 614 791-1600
        >
        >Visit FORESIGHT Corp. at http://www.foresightcorp.com/
        >"Commerce for a New World"
        >

>=======================================================================
        >To signoff the EDI-L list,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >To subscribe,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        >Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/


=======================================================================
        To signoff the EDI-L list,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        To subscribe,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

"WorldSecure" made the following
 annotations on 09/08/00 10:23:26
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[INFO] -- Virus Manager:
This message was scanned with Network Associates Viper,
and no viruses were detected.

==============================================================================

=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list,  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe,               mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/

Reply via email to