Hmmm.
Think I have to disagree there.
An
‘accepted’ 997 (or EDIFACT CONTRL message) is an acknowledgement that the
original document had no EDI syntactic anomalies and that its structure was
understood by the receiving translation/transformation engine. So saying that
a text message could be read is valid. The 997 does not say anything about
whether the content is useful or makes sense to the target audience (be that a
person or an application).
Andy
Andy
Brunnock
Senior
eBusiness Consultant
COMPAQ Global
Services
5310 Harvest
Hill Road
Suite
200
Dallas, TX
75230 USA
Phone: +1
972-702-4237
Fax: +1
972-702-4493
Pager: +1
800-759-8888 pin 1138240 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(alphanumeric)
E-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original
Message-----
From: Lee
LoFrisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 11:29
AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 997 and
864
The purpose
of the 864 is to convey a message in a human-readable form. The data
contained in the 864 is not intended to be processed
electronically.
The 997 is
to used to convey back to the trading partner the status of a received message
(accepted, rejected, .... etc.), and is intended to be processed
electronically.
The
industry standard is not to use the 997 for common
messages.
-----Original Message-----
From: Electronic Data Interchange Issues
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Linda Holden Givens
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 12:07
PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 997 and 864
Would a 997 Functional Acknowledgement
and 864 Text Message be feasible to use for a Common Message?
Linda
Holden Givens
(253) 288-9962hm
(206) 790-1737cell
Do You
Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - Get
email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.