I am assuming you are translating X12/EDIFACT to either XML or Positional, then use SQL maps to load the db? If that is the plan, then I would use XML for readability when you are trying to troubleshoot data being passed. My 2ยข
Dave Records Records Consulting, LLC Phone: 616.583.0090 Email: [email protected] On Jan 24, 2011, at 2:58 PM, vu.lynn wrote: > EDI environment: SI 5.06 (GIS) with Oracle database. > We're going to migrate our EDI/GIS system in which we need to remap all GIS > maps. Currently we are using both xml and positional formats. In the new > system, we need to choose one standard mapping format. My question to SI > (GIS) experts in EDI-L group: What format do you prefer (xml or positional > format)? And what is advantage of chosing one format over the other? > > TIA, > > LV > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ ... Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
