On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 14:58 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > Then I gave my R-b to this patch, admitting that I couldn't verify the > edk2-only customizations against the 1.0.2f release. > > Turns out those customizations are indeed no longer correct, so my R-b > was in error.
Er, aren't they? Are you referring to my comment about the RT#3955 fix? That isn't actually *less* correct than it ever was. -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
