On 02/18/16 16:45, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 14:27 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 14:58 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >>> >>> Then I gave my R-b to this patch, admitting that I couldn't verify the >>> edk2-only customizations against the 1.0.2f release. >>> >>> Turns out those customizations are indeed no longer correct, so my R-b >>> was in error. >> >> Er, aren't they? Are you referring to my comment about the RT#3955 fix? >> >> That isn't actually *less* correct than it ever was. > > And, embarrassingly, it looks like OpenSSL 1.1 has a fix which looks > much more like the one in EDKII_openssl-1.0.2f.patch, than the one in > my own tree. > > Is there room for me to come and crawl under that rock *with* you...? >
I pretty much made myself convenient and used up all the room here, in my shame. If you want to join me, you're going to have to transgress way harder than this! ;) I'll be in my bunk ^W^W^W under my rock. Laszlo _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
