On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 09:45 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > Did you *really* enable the building of openssl-1.0.2x/ssl/*.c in the > > above builds? Or are you talking about something different? > > No, and since I'm not using it, separating it is fine with me.
And here's where I came in... is there any need for it to be separate? If the objects corresponding to ssl/*.c are present in the library archive, doesn't that just mean that they'll get pulled in if they're *referenced*, and not if they're not? So why separate it out into OpensslTlsLib at all? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre [email protected] Intel Corporation
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
