On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 17:53 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 09:45 -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > Did you *really* enable the building of openssl-1.0.2x/ssl/*.c in > > > the > > > above builds? Or are you talking about something different? > > > > No, and since I'm not using it, separating it is fine with me. > > And here's where I came in... is there any need for it to be > separate? > > If the objects corresponding to ssl/*.c are present in the library > archive, doesn't that just mean that they'll get pulled in if they're > *referenced*, and not if they're not? So why separate it out into > OpensslTlsLib at all?
OK, I promise to wait until un jetlagged before answering next time. However, my answer is no, combined is fine ... it's a libaray. James
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
