On 2015-05-04 14:32:48, Brian J. Johnson wrote: > On 05/04/2015 02:11 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > I do think such files should be distinguished with a separate filename > > suffix. > > Yes. Otherwise developers will get confused why some ".uni" files work > with their tools, and some do not.
Mike, what do you think about Laszlo and Brian's feedback that a separate extension should be used? Laszlo mentioned that we can't use the lack of the UTF-16-LE BOM because that is supposed to be interpreted as a UTF16 file with BE characters. Brian mentioned that developers may try to use utf-8 .uni files with older tools, and get errors. > Nice work, Jordan! Thanks Brian. Any Reviewed-by from you for the series? :) -Jordan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight. http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
