On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com> wrote: > Roy, > > I do not have any issues with adding this detailed description when multiple > authors are involved in a single patch. > > In general, I think it would be good to avoid having multiple Signed-off-by > in a single patch. From one perspective, it could be possible for the patch > to be broken up into multiple patches with a different Signed-off-by in each > patch. But I can imagine cases, where that actually makes the code changes > in patches difficult to review and understand. So this is really just > providing details on how to merge patches from multiple authors into a single > patch. Is my understating correct? > > Thanks, > > Mike >
Hi Mike, The main way this comes up is when someone posts a patch in response to a patch series or a question on how to do something. What prompted my patch to Contributions.txt was I asked a question, and Laszlo very helpfully posted a patch to solve my problem. His patch belongs as part of my series (implementing a new terminal type), so I will be submitting patches authored by me, as well as the one by Laszlo. It gets very difficult to coordinate submissions if my patchset now becomes dependent on a patch that Laszlo would need to submit - interdependent patchsets developed by multiple people adds a lot of overhead, and is nice to avoid when possible. It will be a minority of patches that will have multiple signed-off-by lines, but I wanted to document the proper handling of this. I think that the practice of providing patches in response to questions or patchsetset problems is a good one that we don't want do discourage. Thanks, Roy > -----Original Message----- > From: Roy Franz [mailto:roy.fr...@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:17 AM > To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: ler...@redhat.com; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdePkg: Describe submission of a patch authored > by someone else > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Olivier Martin <olivier.mar...@arm.com> > wrote: >> I think your change should be integrated to a new top file >> 'Contributions.txt' and all the package 'Contributions.txt' should refer to >> this file. >> Otherwise we will start to get some inconsistencies between >> 'Contributions.txt'. > > edk2$ find . -name Contributions.txt | wc -l > 38 > > Ouch! (At least they are all identical.) > > I found the MdePackage instance (google brought me there), and didn't > look to see if there were more.... > > These should definitely be replaced with a single top-level instance. > Any modules that require different content > can add a specialized one, but since they are all identical, that is a > current requirement. > > Once the content of changes is agreed upon, I'll update my patch to do > this as well. > > Roy > > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Roy Franz [mailto:roy.fr...@linaro.org] >> Sent: 23 June 2015 19:36 >> To: edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; ler...@redhat.com; >> michael.d.kin...@intel.com >> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdePkg: Describe submission of a patch authored by >> someone else >> >> Add a description of how to describe the authorship of a patch that is >> submitted by someone other than the original author. >> Add mention of git format-patch --stat=120 option for generating more useful >> patch names in diffstat. >> >> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0 >> Signed-off-by: Roy Franz <roy.fr...@linaro.org> >> --- >> MdePkg/Contributions.txt | 11 ++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/MdePkg/Contributions.txt b/MdePkg/Contributions.txt index >> f87cbd7..98de958 100644 >> --- a/MdePkg/Contributions.txt >> +++ b/MdePkg/Contributions.txt >> @@ -67,7 +67,16 @@ Patch content inline or attached >> * The first line of commit message is taken from the email's subject >> line following [PATCH]. The remaining portion of the commit message >> is the email's content until the '---' line. >> -* git format-patch is one way to create this format >> +* git format-patch is one way to create this format. In order to get >> + useful path names in the diffstat, the "--stat=120" option should >> + be used. >> +* If a patch is being submitted by someone other than the orginal >> + author, then the orginal author's Signed-off-by/Contributed-under >> +lines >> + should be first, followed by the Signed-off-by/Contributed-under >> +lines >> + of the patch submitter. Any changes made by the submitter should be >> + noted above the submitter's Signed-off-by line. If git is being used >> + to prepare the patches, the git author of the commit corresponding to >> + the patch should be owned by the original author (git commit --author). >> >> === Definitions for sample patch email === >> >> -- >> 2.1.4 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! >> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors >> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms >> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o >> _______________________________________________ >> edk2-devel mailing list >> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel >> >> >> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are >> confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended >> recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the >> contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the >> information in any medium. Thank you. >> >> ARM Limited, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, >> Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2557590 >> ARM Holdings plc, Registered office 110 Fulbourn Road, Cambridge CB1 9NJ, >> Registered in England & Wales, Company No: 2548782 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! >> OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors >> network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms >> for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o >> _______________________________________________ >> edk2-devel mailing list >> edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel