Paul, Those nice people in SEM who you think probably treated me so well.... remember how I began this discussion a few weeks ago on this newslist? The journal Structural Equation Modeling requested and accepted a paper from me on structural equation modeling. They held it for three years, explicitly forbidding me from sharing it. After three years they rejected the paper and refused to discuss it further with me. That is unethical, it is breech of contract and it is criminal. Why not give your learned opinion on that?
I am not saying you have done anything criminal. You appear to be simply be incapable of an intellectual discussion . When you start signing contracts and violating them, then we can talk criminal. "Paul Bernhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 9/29/02 8:14 PM: > > >CR works, regardless of > >the criminal lengths to which statisticians are willing to go to suppress > >this fact. > > Who, exactly, are you saying has acted criminally? Do you think I have > acted criminally? In what way? Someone must fit this description because > you make the statement without ambiguity. To whom are you refering? > > Paul > . > . > ================================================================= > Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the > problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: > . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . > ================================================================= . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
