Paul,
Not at all. You have a professional responsibility to object to scientific fraud. You can see the acceptance and rejection letters at any time. You can sign onto SEMNET and ask them what happened. There is a lot you can do. But because your primary goal is to attack me and CR, you will not test the SEM folks. You lack the courage, the integrity and responsibility. Try to be a man and face what you are and what you are not. If you really want to know the truth, you will look for it and face what you find with honesty and courage. Be a real scholar. Bill "Paul Bernhardt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 9/30/02 10:33 AM: > > >Those nice people in SEM who you think probably treated me so well.... > >remember how I began this discussion a few weeks ago on this newslist? The > >journal Structural Equation Modeling requested and accepted a paper from me > >on structural equation modeling. They held it for three years, explicitly > >forbidding me from sharing it. After three years they rejected the paper > >and refused to discuss it further with me. That is unethical, it is breech > >of contract and it is criminal. Why not give your learned opinion on that? > > My opinion on matters to which I have no personal experience and of which > only know one side is irrelevant. > > Paul > . > . > ================================================================= > Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the > problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: > . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . > ================================================================= . . ================================================================= Instructions for joining and leaving this list, remarks about the problem of INAPPROPRIATE MESSAGES, and archives are available at: . http://jse.stat.ncsu.edu/ . =================================================================
