"Miles Lott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > The following is my personal opinion and does not constitute an > administrative decision: > > Lars Kneschke wrote: >> Why do we need to wait until march? I thought that we have 3 project admins? >> > Yes, but some of us have lives away from egw. I am currently trying to > get 2 new businesses going. Sorry, but that is the most important thing > right now, since they pay my rent. If you don't have the time to care of our project, then please step back. Other people have the needed time.
> What you are perceiving has everything to do with our current stated or > unstated opinion on the Nigel 'issue' being different from your own. As > far as I am concerned, the only issue is how you will deal with him > continuing to be a project member. It does not impact your ability to > write code for tine or egroupware, so please concentrate on this, if > this is what you want to do. If you are only interested in removing him > as a project member, then I think you will only find disappointment. >> From my point of view, we can drop the constitution of our project in the >> trash can. No one cares and takes care about it anyway. >> > The way in which Nigel became a project member and the fact that he is a > project member does not, as far as I can see right now, violate the > constitution. What I see is only a strong hatred towards him. With > that sort of emotion, you will never be happy as long as you keep up > with this fight. You are the one who has to make a decision. > > If he is not the reason for you wanting to trash the constitution, then > what is? A quote from our constitution: The Open Source Groupware Suite eGroupWare is a community effort, developed by people for their own enjoyment or to make their living from it. --> The ultimate instance in the eGroupWare project are these developers. <-- ... Ralf asked if someone will object if he adds Nigel to our project. Cornelius and me objected as Nigel massively offended us and still did not apologize for his actions. Ralf simply ignored our opinion. And you too. As long as the admins don't listen to the developers as the ultimate instance in our project, the constitution can be dropped into the trashcan. If the admins don't take care of the constitution, why should I? Why should I accept these admins anymore? I don't need admins which don't care of my interests, but only care about there own interests. As admin it is your job to find a solution all projectmembers can live with. But you even did't try to do this. -- Lars Kneschke CTO OfficeSpot.Net Metaways Infosystems GmbH Pickhuben 2-4, D-20457 Hamburg eGroupWare Support: http://www.egroupware-support.net OfficeSpot.Net Collaboration Server: http://cs.officespot.net our proposal for the next major eGroupWare release: http://www.tine20.org E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.metaways.de Tel: +49 (0)40 317031-21 Fax: +49 (0)40 317031-921 Mobile: +49 (0)175 9304324 Metaways Infosystems GmbH - Sitz: D-22967 Tremsbüttel Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Ahrensburg HRB 4508 Geschäftsführung: Hermann Thaele, Lüder-H.Thaele ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ eGroupWare-core mailing list eGroupWare-core@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/egroupware-core
