I do not know what Gemstone's licensing is
specifically, but I do that many products require that
any publishing of performance metrics be approved by
the company first. I think it is a way to prevent one
on one performance comparisons without their
oversight, such as this.
//Nicholas
--- William Grosso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lougie Anderson wrote:
>
> >The purpose of this message is for GemStone to
> comment
> >on the "EJB Comparison Project" report recently
> released
> >by a group at Charles University in the Czech
> Republic.
>
> An interesting post. Kinda short on details (please,
> post
> the url to the detailed response) but interesting.
>
> >
> > So while GemStone is pleased with the intent
> behind the work at Charles
> > University, we are disappointed that they didn't
> open a dialog with our
> > company or with the industry in order to ensure
> relevancy and accuracy in
> > their report, and to abide by the terms of our
> license agreement.
> >
>
>
> That last phrase kind of slid into the rest of this.
> What licensing terms does an academic group
> attempting to
> measure performance violate ?
>
>
> William Grosso
>
>
===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general
> help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the
> message "help".
>
>
=====
"Suzie, Suzie, Suzie, Suzie
Suzie, Suzie Greenberg"
Suzie Greenberg, Phish
--
Nicholas Whitehead
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
