Tim Endres wrote:
> If you, as the vendor, feel the report is flawed, then you have a website,
> and can make your case just like anyone else. I think anyone producing a
> test report should feel obliged to link to your "test rebuttal", which
> will
> allow me to see where you feel the test is flawed, and allow me to
> evaluate
> what I think that means in the overall comparison.
>
[Randy Stafford] Stay tuned.
> HOWEVER, seeing that report DISAPPEAR from the Internet is *CHILLING*!!!
>
> It strikes me as Censorship, and it reminds me of the Thought Ministry.
>
[Randy Stafford] You seem to be making an implicit assumption in
this and other posts that we had something to do with removing that report
from the Internet. As far as I know we did not. My best guess is that
Charles University removed the report, perhaps to redress its shortcomings,
or perhaps out of responsible legal concern over potentially violating not
only GemStone's but also WebLogic's license agreement
Randy Stafford
Senior Architect
GemStone Professional Services
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
