I agree - a logically, the application design will be so much more effective
if the database can be encapsulated behind the CMP. Of course
there are many other hurdles to cross to realize that goal.
>From: Cedric Beust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Cedric Beust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: future directions: CMP or BMP?
>Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:55:42 -0700
>
> > From: A mailing list for Enterprise JavaBeans development
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rein Reezigt
>
> > Now that it seems to me that a lot of problems like associations are
> > solved in the EJB spec, more people will start using CMP. Will there a
> > point where BMP will not be used anymore?
>
>That would be my guess. I see EJB containers evolving in the same way that
>compilers did: there used to be a point some time ago in hand-coding
>certain parts of your application in assembly language, but it is no longer
>realistic because
>
>- compilers are way better than humans at keeping track of the evolution of
>the processors and their instruction set
>
>- even if a human might beat a compiler on specific portions of the
>application, the compiler will always win overall
>
>Replace "compilers" with "EJB containers", "processors" with "databases",
>"instruction set" with "JDBC drivers", and I believe you will see the
>analogy...
>
></crystal_ball>
>
>
>--
>Cedric
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
