You could always delegate the business methods to code that is shared
by multiple views. Anyway in many cases I suspect that views would be
read-only so it all boils down to how much code is present for
reformatting/exposing the CMP fields.
Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> >
> > Perhaps I am missing something, but it is fairly
> > straghtforward to define
> > multiple entity beans that map to the same table. So these
> > 'view' objects
> > can simply be entity beans that define only the needed
> > fields. The only
> > thing that could conceivably get in the way of this is if
> > your container
> > insists on calling ejbStore even when you haven't changed any of the
> > field values.
> >
>
> You aren't seriously suggesting that we duplicate portions of out entity
> beans, are you?
>
> - Avi
> --
> And now for something completely different.
>
> ===========================================================================
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
> of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
--
________________________________________________________________________________
Evan Ireland Sybase EAServer Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wellington, New Zealand +64 4 934-5856
===========================================================================
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
