Can someone with admin access to this list unsubscribe this nut below? (or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks > -----Original Message----- > From: I. Tsuker [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 7:11 PM > To: Raymond Blum > Subject: Re: Re: Best IDE ? > > Hi There. > > I 'm tired of your messages coming to our server. I have warned you few > times already. > > there is no users @hotsafe.com > > All your mail will be considered as unsolicited and will be prosecuted. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raymond Blum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 2:11 PM > Subject: Re: Best IDE ? > > > > Beaware- I have been a big fan of WebGain Studio but have found it to be > > continually "fragile" in release after release. Some problems were > major > > such as corrupt projects resulting in loss of deployment descriptor info > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Omar Tazi [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 5:18 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Best IDE ? > > > > > > If you are targeting Weblogic or iPlanet (or even Tomcat), your best > bet > > > is > > > > > > WebGain Studio. JSP or any type of debugging is great and very easy to > > > use. > > > > > > -Omar > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Carlos Duque [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:52 AM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Best IDE ? > > > > > > > > > Swaminathan, > > > > > > Depends. If coding for WAS 3.5.x, VAJ EE has some advantages because > of > > > the tight coupling between the two products, but the Smalltalk code > > > underlying VAJ renders it rather limited and inappropriate (unit > testing > > > is > > > essentially a contrived simulation that frequently produces inaccurate > > > results). Moreover, it is really limited in complying with full J2EE > > > specs, but then so is WAS. > > > > > > If coding for WAS 4.0 is the proposition, a far better product than > WAS > > > 3.5.x, then of the currently available IDEs VAJ should be your last > choice > > > for the reasons stated. JBuilder Enterprise Edition would be vastly > > > better, and Forte 3.0 (either Internet if one does need the EJB > templates > > > or Enterprise Editon if one prefers them) would also be superior. > > > Although > > > with Forte for Java 3.0 Enterprise Edition, unit testing might be more > > > difficult in the absence of a WAS plug in. > > > > > > However, the WebSphere Studio Application Developer, which is > currently > > > available only in Preview Edition (i.e., beta), unless you are among > the > > > really fortunate few, is hands down the best product for WAS 4.0. It > is > > > really well integrated, has a real WAS test environment, is geared for > > > J2EE > > > development-- the paradigm is different from the other IDEs, which > are > > > essentially patterned after the MS Visual Studio and its ancestors. > It > is > > > due shortly for full release. It would be well worth the wait, and > well > > > worth testing. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > At 12:17 AM 10/18/01, Swaminathan K N wrote: > > > >Hi , > > > > > > > >Although its slightly off topic, I would like to ask this. How does > the > > > IDEs > > > >for Java like IBM Visual Age for Java , Borland J Builder compare. > Which > > > is > > > >more suited for J2EE development and what are the strengths and > > > weaknesses > > > >of these products ??? > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > >Swaminathan K.N. > > > > > > > > >========================================================================= > > > == > > > >To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in > the > > > body > > > >of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email > to > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > ========================================================================== > > > = > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the > > > body > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email > to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > > > > > > > ========================================================================== > > > = > > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the > > > body > > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email > to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > > > > > ========================================================================== > = > > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the > body > > of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help". > > > > =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "signoff EJB-INTEREST". For general help, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
