Hi, 
  Since Marvel requires a license for production usage, does this mean in 
order to use the Marvel bundled Sense against a production instance 
requires you to buy a license? 

I just got out of a meeting where I told a bunch of people to go download 
sense off the chrome store. Whoops :) 

Thanks!
Paul

On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 12:14:44 PM UTC-4, kimchy wrote:
>
> Sense started as a weekend project, and Boaz did not place a license on 
> it. As you mentioned, this license effectively applies: 
> http://choosealicense.com/no-license/. We consulted our lawyers, who 
> specialize in open source, and changing the license to open source one is 
> complex, expensive, and requires a lot of resources. The reason is that its 
> not only getting the committers agreement, but also reaching all possible 
> users and have them agree to it (or at least showing big investment in 
> trying to do so, + a rather large time window to allow for people to 
> object).
>
> When Boaz created Sense, he was not employed by Elasticsearch. Obviously 
> any project started by our employees has a clear license (as you can notice 
> with the many projects we created).
>
> Regarding Marvel:
>
> - You are only required to pay for it when used in production.
> - You don’t have to be a support customer of Elasticsearch the company, 
> you can buy a license for Marvel easily on the web. We made it super cheap 
> since we think its something that a lot of people will find benefit from.
>
> On Apr 1, 2014, at 17:00, Ivan Brusic <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> I personally do not require an open source license for Marvel/Sense, but I 
> would like to see an explicit clarification about the use of Marvel in this 
> scenario. Marvel does require a license to use and that would apply to any 
> of its subsystems. Then again, Sense does not have a license, which means 
> its use is also somewhat restricted.
>
> Sense is an excellent tool and users dependency on the tool is quite 
> apparent from this thread. :)
>
> I haven't packaged a Chrome plugin in about 3 years. Not only has my 
> memory faded, but I would assume the mechanism has changed in our fast 
> changing world of development. It would be a fun exercise to attempt to do 
> it again.
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Tim S <[email protected] <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> @kimchy the whole reason for me asking these questions is that sometimes 
>> a customer is using elasticsearch but they don't (yet) have a support 
>> contract, but don't consider themselves "in development" either, and thus 
>> wouldn't allow me to use Marvel. Yes, there are other tools for poking 
>> around, but sense is invaluable for constructing complicated queries etc 
>> quickly. In this situation they wouldn't let me install a chrome plugin 
>> either, but sense works nicely as an elasticsearch plugin too.
>>
>> So, if sense (the abandoned version on github) had some kind of 
>> permissive licence, I could turn up on customer site and use sense to poke 
>> around.
>> Ideally, it would have a licence like AL2 which would allow me to modify 
>> it if necessary.
>>
>> I realise that you don't want updates pushed back to the version of sense 
>> on github because those changes are helping you to make money from Marvel, 
>> I understand that. But if the abandoned version of sense did have an 
>> appropriate licence, it would allow us to use the current version - it's 
>> still useful even if it's not kept up to date. I might even be tempted to 
>> try and keep it up to date in my spare time. But clearly I can't do this 
>> unless it has a licence that allows me to do it.
>>
>> Glad to see I'm not the only person thinking along these lines.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 11:15:07 AM UTC+1, Jörg Prante wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 for Sense standalone packaging
>>> +1 for Sense in Chrome Web Store
>>>
>>> Sense is used here all the time, it's essential.
>>>
>>> I have also forked the code in case Sense goes away, hoping for a FOSS 
>>> license.
>>>
>>> Not that I'm fluid in writing browser plugins, but if I find time, I am 
>>> not afraid of the learning curve.
>>>
>>> Jörg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "elasticsearch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/837794c8-1a0a-411f-a29c-852133d6fbc2%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/837794c8-1a0a-411f-a29c-852133d6fbc2%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "elasticsearch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQDQQ%2BJRADr%2Bu%3DiqHjs9suKS6Yu8pSc1aKv0JsmavFypoQ%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/CALY%3DcQDQQ%2BJRADr%2Bu%3DiqHjs9suKS6Yu8pSc1aKv0JsmavFypoQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"elasticsearch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/elasticsearch/d22cd5e3-9f6f-4142-8021-71b033ac38de%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to