Or maybe it is instead better to use them on phone as well to broaden the knowledge of ham radio operators whether they know code or are "no-code". If they are "no-code" and someday decide to get interested in code it will seem like an easier transition for them. After all, learning the code itself is apparently quite difficult these days, not to mention having to learn all sorts of new lingo that goes with it. Gosh, back in the days when I learned code and the Q-signals and other abbreviations and so on it wasn't so difficult, but based on many emails I read (not here though) it must have gotten more difficult, probably about the time the no-code license was suggested.
Oh, I better not forget to add "HI HI" as a tagline to the above comments! Mark, NK8Q >From: Dan Romanchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Mon Jun 13 09:10:54 CDT 2005 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Use of Abbreviations (OT?) >I don't mind awfully much when someone uses QRM or QRN on >phone, BUT, one thing I think you'll have to watch out for >in the future is that there will be many no-code who simply >don't know the codes. Since they never worked CW, they will >never have had a chance to learn them. I run into this often >on 2m FM when talking to no-code Techs. > >All things considered, it's probably best to avoid the use >of Q-signals on phone. > >73! > >Dan KB6NU >================================================= _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: [email protected] You must be a subscriber to post to the list. Subscriber Info (Addr. Change, sub, unsub etc.): http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com
