Interesting!  The balun I made is just a basic core type current balun
modeled after the one listed here (but made with high temp wire inside
teflon tubing):

http://vk5ajl.com/projects/baluns.php#current


On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Adrian <vk4...@bigpond.com> wrote:

> The external balun you are using is probably better than the one built into
> the tuner. An English ham did research some time  back and found using a
> 1:1
> current balun less lossy that a 4:1 or others, despite the line mismatch
> the
> tuner made up for it with tested less total loss.
>
> With a well designed tuner/balun combo the circulating current is much
> less,
> and it is only the resistance component that provides loss, not inductive
> nor capacitive.
>
> vk4tux
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Matt Murphy
> Sent: Friday, 6 April 2012 5:53 AM
> To: d...@w3fpr.com
> Cc: Vic K2VCO; elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 power reduction due to high SWR
>
> One related question, when speaking of the efficiency of a balanced
> feedline
> + balun and tuner, what would be a best/worst case scenario for the loss
> introduced by the balun+tuner?  Would loss vary significantly by frequency
> for a nonresonant antenna?  I'm trying to develop an intuition about the
> lossiness of the tuner+balun compared to, say, 50' of RG213.
>
> I've opted to use a 1:1 balun at the end of 450 ohm ladder line, then a
> short length of coax into a TenTec 229 tuner.  In the informal test that I
> performed, the homebrew 1:1 balun + coax jumper improved the performance of
> the antenna compared with connecting it directly to the balanced line
> connectors on the back of the tuner.
>
> 73,
> Matt NQ6N
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Don Wilhelm <w3...@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Vic,
> >
> > Where was the frequency of the GDO with respect to the band the tuner
> > was set to?  If it was below the band of interest, I would expect
> > something like that - the T-Network is a high pass filter.
> >
> > 73,
> > Don W3FPR
> >
> >
> > On 4/5/2012 12:28 PM, Vic K2VCO wrote:
> > > Speaking of balanced lines and tuners, I recently did an experiment
> > > that
> > surprised me.
> > >
> > > I have a dipole fed with 600-ohm open-wire line (and some window
> > > line
> > indoors). I usually
> > > tune it with a Johnson Matchbox, a fully balanced link-coupled tuner.
> > >
> > > I was lucky enough to get my hands on a massive, high-quality
> > > edge-wound
> > rotary inductor
> > > in a well-made aluminum enclosure. So I built a high-power T-network
> > tuner with it. I
> > > purchased a good (and expensive) 1:1 balun designed for use after a
> > tuner from DX
> > > Engineering, and compared the T-net + balun to the Matchbox. I
> > > didn't
> > notice any
> > > difference in the strength of received signals between the tuners.
> > >
> > > But here is the surprising part: I expected that the Matchbox would
> > provide better
> > > balance, which would reduce radiation and pickup from the feedline.
> > > To
> > test this, I
> > > coupled a grid-dip oscillator to the feedline about 20 feet from the
> > tuner.
> > >
> > > To my great surprise, the signal from the oscillator was much weaker
> > with the T-network +
> > > balun than with the Matchbox!
> > >
> > > Signals the same, 'noise' weaker. So much for the need for 'truly
> > balanced' tuners!
> > >
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
> > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to