Thanks Walter. I had forgotten that Rob Sherwood had tested it. Interesting.
The dynamic range looks pretty good compared with other rigs even without
the KXFL3. I don't have enough technical background to understand the
significance of footnote v, though. Perhaps some knowledgeable person could
explain?
Would anyone who has a KX3 without a KXFL3 care to comment on their
experience?
73
Geoff
G3UCK
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Underwood
Yes, it is possible to quantify it. See the measurements with and without
the roofing filter here (you'll need to check the footnotes):
http://www.sherweng.com/table.html
wunder
K6WRU
On Jan 28, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Geoffrey Downs wrote:
Has anyone tried the KX3 both with and without the KXFL3?
The manual says it results in a "significant
performance improvement in rejecting extremely strong interfering signals
that are just a few kHz away from
the received signal."
I wonder if it's possible to quantify that?
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
