98 percent of contesters? Exaggerate much?
I am sure we can find examples of your infractions easily enough during
non contest periods.
So many trolls...............
Mike W0MU
On 4/27/2014 7:39 PM, Milverton M. Swire via Elecraft wrote:
willful
use of a bandwidth in excess of 2.8 KHz can *still* be considered a
violation in conjunction with other conditions - particularly
interference, splatter, distortion, IMD, etc. <<<<
NOW!!!!!
You have just Describe 98% of those who proclaim their love of Contesting!
[particularly!
interference, splatter, distortion, IMD, etc.]
BTW.
Aggressive use of Compression (PUNCH)
Overly active ALC.
And! Last but not the least, chronic twisting of the mic gain knob
to the right is tantamount of the above mention.
Maybe, we should just include the Contester in this tantivy as well.
((((73)))) Milverton. / W9MMS
On Sunday, April 27, 2014 8:09 PM, "Joe Subich, W4TV" <[email protected]> wrote:
On the other hand, Title 47 which includes more than Part 97 regularly
defines SSB as 2K80J3E (2.8 KHz bandwidth) and specifies a maximum
modulating frequency of 2.8 KHz for various FM voice "communications"
services.
Given that standard, and the fact that RM-10740 was dismissed without
modifying the rule that requires the use of minimum bandwidth, without
modifying the rules against intentional interference, and without
modifying the rule that requires "good engineering practice," willful
use of a bandwidth in excess of 2.8 KHz can *still* be considered a
violation in conjunction with other conditions - particularly
interference, splatter, distortion, IMD, etc.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 4/27/2014 8:42 PM, Milverton M. Swire via Elecraft wrote:
This issue is not just about "...other hams having fun doing what they
want to do with their K3s", there really are some good engineering
reasons for not using ESSB below 100 MHz. Joe has articulated a few.
Beyond the "...other hams having fun..." argument, is there really any
other reason to do ESSB? <<<<
David, et al.
The question of " Legality " and Engineering reasoning has been bantered around
on numerous different occasions.
There are many in their zeal to defend their ideals will make frivolous
statements on
what should or should not be the accepted TBW.
Irrespective of what some of us may think, there are no set number on TBW for
SSB.
For those who are about to get their under wears in a wad, here are the FCC
view on the
subject a define bandwidth on Phone.
http://www.nu9n.com/images/FCC-DA-04-3661A1-final.pdf
There are many of us who often times forget that this is a HOBBY for Amateurs.
((((73)))) Milverton.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
