For the same reason that people are trying to make qso's on 160 using
some type of incredibly slow transmission mode that appears to most as
local qrm. Because you can, doesn't mean you should.
Mike W0MU
On 4/27/2014 10:26 PM, David Cole wrote:
Milverton,
Respectfully, your reply does not answer the question-- is there really
a need for ESSB?
Your answer merely introduces a totally different argument into this
discussion, (the legal argument), while using my question as a launching
point for a subject change. I am not asking about if it is legal, I am
asking why do it at all? Is this really to use an ESSB supporters own
words, "...other hams having fun..."?
The legal issue will sort itself out. If ESSB does not have it's own
emission definition, (one accepted by the FCC), and is classed with SSB,
then it is not legal. This conclusion on my part is based on Part
97.307(a), again, this assumes that ESSB and SSB have the same emission
designation as per the FCC.
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]
