Milverton,
Again, respectfully I submit that you are trying to shift the subject
off of ESSB, to anywhere else now.  

Joe is not talking about Contesting, he is talking about ESSB.

-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info


On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 18:39 -0700, Milverton M. Swire via Elecraft
wrote:
> >>>>  willful
> use of a bandwidth in excess of 2.8 KHz can *still* be considered a
> violation in conjunction with other conditions - particularly
> interference, splatter, distortion, IMD, etc. <<<< 
> 
> NOW!!!!! 
> You have just Describe 98% of those who proclaim their love of Contesting! 
> 
> [particularly!
> interference, splatter, distortion, IMD, etc.]
> 
> BTW. 
> Aggressive use of Compression (PUNCH) 
> Overly active ALC. 
> And! Last but not the least, chronic twisting of the mic gain knob 
> to the right is tantamount of the above mention.
> 
> Maybe, we should just include the Contester in this tantivy as well. 
> 
> 
> 
> ((((73)))) Milverton. / W9MMS
> 
> 
> On Sunday, April 27, 2014 8:09 PM, "Joe Subich, W4TV" <li...@subich.com> 
> wrote:
>  
> 
> >On the other hand, Title 47 which includes more than Part 97 regularly
> >defines SSB as 2K80J3E (2.8 KHz bandwidth) and specifies a maximum
> >modulating frequency of 2.8 KHz for various FM voice "communications"
> >services.
> >
> >Given that standard, and the fact that RM-10740 was dismissed without
> >modifying the rule that requires the use of minimum bandwidth, without
> >modifying the rules against intentional interference, and without
> >modifying the rule that requires "good engineering practice," willful
> >use of a bandwidth in excess of 2.8 KHz can *still* be considered a
> >violation in conjunction with other conditions - particularly
> >interference, splatter, distortion, IMD, etc.
> >
> >73,
> >
> >    ... Joe, W4TV
> >
> >
> >
> >On 4/27/2014 8:42 PM, Milverton M. Swire via Elecraft wrote:
> >>>>>> This issue is not just about "...other hams having fun doing what they
> >> want to do with their K3s", there really are some good engineering
> >> reasons for not using ESSB below 100 MHz.  Joe has articulated a few.
> >> Beyond the "...other hams having fun..." argument, is there really any
> >> other reason to do ESSB? <<<<
> >>
> >> David, et al.
> >>
> >> The question of " Legality " and Engineering reasoning has been bantered 
> >> around
> >> on numerous different occasions.
> >> There are many in their zeal to defend their ideals will make frivolous 
> >> statements on
> >> what should or should not be the accepted TBW.
> >> Irrespective of what some of us may think, there are no set number on TBW 
> >> for SSB.
> >>
> >> For those who are about to get their under wears in a wad, here are the 
> >> FCC view on the
> >> subject a define bandwidth on Phone.
> >>
> >> http://www.nu9n.com/images/FCC-DA-04-3661A1-final.pdf
> >>
> >> There are many of us who often times forget that this is a HOBBY for 
> >> Amateurs.
> >>
> >> ((((73)))) Milverton.
> >>
> >>
> >______________________________________________________________
> >Elecraft mailing list
> >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> >Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >
> >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >Message delivered to tnny...@yahoo.com
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to d...@nk7z.net

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to