Sorry, that simply is not true. You don't understand how these Metcal, newer Hakko (and other) irons work. Our production facility produces thousands of through-hole boards per month. After testing the newer soldering stations we immediately started replacing conventional Weller WTCPT and Hakko 936 irons because both time per joint is faster and temperature is more consistent as you move to the next joint.

These newer designs intentionally use tips with low thermal mass, have a fast control loop (rather than slow on/off cycling), and sense temperature at the tip. Adjusting the iron temperature is normally not required because the iron instantaneously provides more heat to maintain the set temperature. If the rate is too slow, you would first look at tip geometry to more efficiently transfer heat.

This document describes the functional difference between conventional vs new irons.
http://www.eis-inc.com/Files/pdf/supplier_showcase_page_downloads/oki/Tech_Note_High_Throughput_With_SmarHeat.pdf

73,
Josh W6XU

On 6/2/2016 10:25 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
That "rule" still applies - if less than 2 seconds, reduce the iron temperature, if longer than 3 seconds, increase it. A lot will depend on the size and heat mass of the soldering tip more so than the recovery time of the iron. A quick recovery is fine, but is not the whole story.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 6/2/2016 12:43 PM, Josh Fiden wrote:
I would respectfully disagree with this advice. It is dependent on the type of iron you're using. The Hakko FX-951 behaves quite different from the traditional temperature controlled stations. It has very fast thermal recovery, so typical through hole pads will flow in much less than 3 seconds, but not because the iron is too hot.

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:[email protected]

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to [email protected]

Reply via email to