I was thinking of a similar remote setup, wondering which remote autotuner
is recommended?
Thanks,
Frank w4tg

On Feb 13, 2018 8:56 AM, "Chris Hallinan" <challi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a very similar setup.  K3 -> KPA500 -> MFJ 994BRT 600W autotuner
> mounted remote -> Balun Designs 4:1 -> 600 Ohm open wire line to 80 m
> doublet.
>
> It works fantastic on 80-20, but will not tune better than about 2:1 on
> 17.  I cannot use the KPA500 on 17 because the SWR is too high.  Nothing
> I've tried works.  I'm wondering if it is simply the tuning
> range/resolution of the MFJ-994BRT?  I like the idea of remote mounting, as
> I have only a couple feet of coax between the tuner and the balun, thus
> minimizing SWR-related feedline loss.
>
> Any suggestions for how to get it to tune on 17?
>
> 73
> Chris - K1AY
> Punta Gorda, FL
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:16 PM, John W2XS <jm...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> > I replaced my Johnson Matchbox with a Balun Designs tuner balun. The
> > biggest
> > benefit is that the K3 ATU remembers the settings from band to band so
> the
> > QSY is very rapid. I love watching the DX spots come rolling through on
> my
> > N3FJP logging program and clicking on them to QSY to that frequency and
> not
> > have to tune up again. I use it on 80 through 6 meters with an 80m
> doublet
> > fed with KW ladder line (300 ohm).
> >
> > My recommendation is to keep the piece of coax from the balun to the rig
> as
> > short as possible.  This is to minimize loss since that line will most
> > likely be highly mis-matched on most bands. There was a QST article not
> > that
> > long ago which detailed the losses in that situation and I was surprised
> at
> > how high they were.
> >
> > I once had an MFJ balanced RF Ammeter and made measurements of the JMB
> vs.
> > the balun and they compared favorably.  DJ0IP (referenced earlier) has
> > kindly put those measurements on his website. (This is in the FWIW
> > category!)
> >
> > I have not tried to substitute the tuner balun with another type but that
> > might be a future experiment.
> >
> > 73, John W2XS
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Elecraft mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
> >
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > Message delivered to challi...@gmail.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Life is like Linux - it never stands still.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to fst...@ieee.org
>
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to